Tag Archives: trade offs

A Case Study on Cache Design Trade-offs for Power and Performance Optimization

Study about Cache Design Trade-offs for Power and Performance Optimization

Abstract:~ Caches consume a significant amount of energy in modern microprocessors. To design an energy-efficient microprocessor, it is important to optimize cache energy consumption. This paper examines performance and power trade-offs in cache designs and the effectiveness of energy reduction for several novel cache design techniques targeted for low power.

Case Study on Power and Performance Optimization

Introduction:~ Portable computing applications have shifted from conventional low performance products such as wristwatches and calculators to high throughput and computation intensive products such as notebook computers and cellular phones. The new portable computing applications require high speed, yet low energy consumption because for such products longer battery life translates to extended use and better marketability. This paper presents a case study of performance and power trade-offs in designing on-chip caches for the microprocessors used in portable computing applications. Keep reading…

Comments

Filed under Operations

A Case Study of Econometrics of Mean-Variance

Case Study about Econometrics of Mean-Variance

Abstract: This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the econometrics of mean-variance efficiency tests. Starting with the classic F test of Gibbons, Ross and Shanken (1989) and its generalised method of moments version, I analyse the effects of the number of assets and portfolio composition on test power. I then discuss asymptotically equivalent tests based on mean representing portfolios and Hansen-Jagannathan frontiers, and study the trade-offs between efficiency and robustness of using parametric and semiparametric likelihood procedures that assume either elliptical innovations or elliptical returns.



Case Study on Econometrics of Mean-Variance

Introduction: Mean-variance analysis is widely regarded as the cornerstone of modern investment theory. Despite its simplicity, and the fact that more than five and a half decades have elapsed since Markowitz published his seminal work on the theory of portfolio allocation under uncertainty (Markowitz (1952)), it remains the most widely used asset allocation method. There are several reasons for its popularity. First, it provides a very intuitive assessment of the relative merits of alternative portfolios, as their risk and expected return characteristics can be compared in a two-dimensional graph.

Click here to read more on Econometrics of Mean-Variance


Comments

Filed under Assorted, Economics

Case Study in Strategy Execution with Extraordinary Leadership at AT&T Driving Transformation & Unity

Case Study about Strategy Execution with Extraordinary Leadership at AT&T Driving Transformation & Unity

Introduction: After a series of joint ventures and acquisitions, AT&T had assembled a wide array of assets. The objective of the senior leadership team was no longer about acquisitions for scale and transformation; it was now about executing on the combined set of assets. AT&T needed to break down silos, change its culture to incorporate more innovative and collaborative thinking, and focus on the complexities and trade-offs in executing on its 3-year plan.



Case Study on Extraordinary Leadership

Team-based Approach Focused on Collaboration, Innovation & Extraordinary Leadership: Participants in each workshop collaborate in teams, which vie with each other for customers and talent in a dynamically competitive marketplace. Teams must execute on AT&T’s strategy while focusing on success factors in AT&T’s Extraordinary Leadership model, a strength-based approach to leadership development. As the first step, teams devise their 3-year plan for successful execution of AT&T’s business plan, including an articulation of the culture required for success.

Click here to read more on Strategy Execution with Extraordinary Leadership

Comments

Filed under Operations, Strategic Sourcing

Case Study on The Impact of Indirect Taxation on the Plantation Sector in Indonesia

Abstract: This study attempts to analyze the impact of the indirect taxes levy on the plantation sector in Indonesia. The aim of this study is to investigate the assumptions that the disincentive fiscal policy could generate some trade offs against some other economic variables i.e. National GDP level, Domestic Prices,total Exports and Imports, Poverty Rates, Government Revenues and Government Consumption Expenditures. This study employs the inter-regional CGE model with bottom-up approach and applyingthe Indonesian Social Accounting Matrix.



Case Study on The Impact of Indirect Taxation on the Plantation Sector in Indonesia

Introduction: The implementation of regional autonomy in Indonesia nowadays is a part of the decentralization process. Regional autonomy aligned with the enactment of Law No. 32 of 2004 on Local Government and Law No. 33 of 2004 on Central and Local Fiscal Balance. In the autonomy era, the local governments are expected to be more assured in exploring their financial resources in order to finance both local needs and local developments (Machfud, 2005). Nevertheless, the implementation of regional autonomy for some government apparatus seemingly defined as the efforts to increase local own revenue through provision of local regulations..
Click here to read more on Indirect Taxation



Comments

Filed under Accounting Case Studies, Finance

Case Study on Corporate environmental responsibility in ITC Limited

Corporate environmental responsibility (CER) has been adopted by many companies globally, as a strategic move to outweigh its competitors. The increase in the number of ‘green consumers’ has forced the business houses to make a serious effort to diversify their products and become responsible ‘green’ companies. In many developed nations, environmental protection agencies have come up with stringent regulations relating to the accounting and disclosures of environmental issues and measurement of cost of environmental degradation.

CER Case Study

Many companies of the developed nations have adapted triple bottom line (TBL) accounting to quantify trade-offs between different facets of sustainability. The Indian firms have also recently been focusing more on discharging their responsibility towards environment. The Corporate Management Committee (CMC) of ITC Limited, the largest cigarette manufacturer of India in its 96th Annual General Meeting has approved the relevant financial, environmental, occupational health, safety and the social policies of the company. Click here to read more…

Register to mark your Comments

Comments

Filed under Free Cases

Case Study on Win-Win Negotiation Badly Executed

In trying to create win-win negotiation agreements, one of the biggest mistakes made by negotiators is to deal with the issues on an issue by issue basis. This often results in a breakdown in negotiations because invariably, conflicting monetary issues arise that result in a showdown between the two parties. Negotiating on an issue by issue agenda does not present the opportunity to make concessionary trade-offs between the different issues.


For example, in January, 1993, management and labour of Bayou Steel in Laplace, Louisiana, sat down to negotiate a new contract. Neither side dreamed that these talks would lead to a strike. Each side believed that they had built a solid relationship. Management went into the negotiations thinking and believing that if they used a win-win negotiation concept, they would increase and enhance the relationship between the shop floor and management. Even Ron Farraro, president of United Steel Workers of America did not conceive of the possibility that talks would collapse into a strike, and that a negotiated contract would be reached with little or no difficulty. To refer this case study click hereWin-Win Negotiation Badly Executed

Case Study on Win-Win Negotiation Badly Executed

Register to mark your Comments

Comments

Filed under Free Cases

World Markets Vs. Economy

Although economics has many facets, the field is unified by several central ideas. In this article, we will take a closer look at Ten Principles of Economics. There is no question as to what an economy is. Whether we are talking about the economy of Los Angeles, England, or Australia, a healthy economy is based on several distinct variables. Because the behaviour of an economy reflects the behaviour of the individuals who make up the economy.

Principle 1: People Face Trade-offs
“There is no such thing as a free lunch.” To get one thing that we like, we usually have to give up another thing that we like. Nonetheless, acknowledging life’s trade-offs is important because people are likely to make good decisions only if they understand the options that they have available.

Principle 2: The Cost of Something Is What You Give Up to Get It.
Because people face trade-offs, making decisions requires comparing the costs and benefits of alternative courses of action. In many cases, however, the cost of some action is not as obvious as it might first appear.

Principle 3: Rational People Think at the Margin
Economists normally assume that people are rational. Rational people systematically and purposefully do the best they can to achieve their objectives, with the opportunities they have.
Michael Leary of Apex Investment Services says that rational people know that decisions in life are rarely black and white but usually involve shades of gray. Economists use the term marginal changes to describe small incremental adjustments to an existing plan of action.

Principle 4: People Respond to Incentives
An incentive is something that induces a person to act. Because rational people make decisions by comparing costs and benefits, they respond to incentives. You will see that incentives play a central role in economics.
Incentives are crucial to analyzing how markets work. For example, when the price of an apple rises, people decide to eat more pears and fewer apples because the cost of buying an apple is higher. At the same time, apple orchards decide to hire more workers and harvest more apples because the benefit of selling an apple is also higher.
When analyzing any policy, we must consider not only the direct effects but also the indirect and sometimes less obvious effects that work through incentives. If the policy changes incentives, it will cause people to alter their behaviour.
As we go about our lives, many of our decisions affect not only ourselves but other people as well. Now we will discuss the next three principles which examine with how people interact with one another.


Principle 5: Trade Can Make Everyone Better Off
It is easy to be misled when thinking about competition among countries. Trade between the United States and Japan is not like a sports contest in which one side wins and the other side loses. In fact, the opposite is true: Trade between two countries can make each country better off.
By trading with others, people can buy a greater variety of goods and services at lower cost.
Countries benefit from the ability to trade with one another. Trade allows countries to specialize in what they do best and to enjoy a greater variety of goods and services. The Japanese, as well as the French and the Egyptians and the Brazilians, are as much our partners in the world economy as they are our competitors.

Principle 6: Markets Are Usually a Good Way to Organize Economic Activity
At first glance, the success of market economies is puzzling. After all, in a market economy, no one is looking out for the economic well-being of society as a whole. Free markets contain many buyers and sellers of numerous goods and services, and all of them are interested primarily in their own well-being. Yet despite decentralized decision making and self-interested decision makers, market economies have proven remarkably successful in organizing economic activity in a way that promotes overall economic well-being.

Principle 7: Governments Can Sometimes Improve Market Outcomes
If the invisible hand of the market is so great, why do we need government?
One reason we need government is that the invisible hand can work its magic only if the government enforces the rules and maintains the institutions that are key to a healthy economy. Most important, markets work only if property rights are enforced. A farmer won’t grow food if he expects his crop to be stolen; a restaurant won’t serve meals unless it is assured that customers will pay before they leave; and a music company won’t produce CDs if too many potential customers avoid paying by making illegal copies. We all rely on government provided police and courts to enforce our rights over the things we produce – and the invisible hand counts on our ability to enforce our rights.
How individuals make decisions, and how people interact with one another make up the many variables of “The Economy.”

Principle 8: A Country’s Standard of Living Depends on Its Ability to Produce Goods and Services
The differences in living standards around the world are staggering. In 2007, the average American had an income of about $37,500. In the same year, the average Mexican earned $8,950, and the average Nigerian earned $900. Not surprisingly, this large variation in average income is reflected in the quality of life. Citizens of high-income countries have more TV sets, more cars, better nutrition, better healthcare, and a longer life expectancy than citizens of low-income countries.
What explains these large differences in living standards among countries and over time? The answer is surprisingly simple. Almost all variation in living standards is attributable to differences in countries’ productivity- the amount of goods and services produced from an employee’s time. In nations where workers can produce a large quantity of goods and services per unit of time, most people enjoy a high standard of living. Similarly, the growth rate of a nation’s productivity determines the growth rate of its average income.

Principle 9: Prices Rise When the Government Prints Too Much Money
In Germany in January 1921, a daily newspaper cost 0.30 marks. Less than 2 years later, in November 1922, the same newspaper cost 70,000,000 marks. All other prices in the economy rose by similar amounts. This instance is one of history’s most stunning examples of inflation.
What causes inflation? In almost all cases of large or persistent inflation, the culprit is growth in the quantity of money. When a government creates large quantities of the nation’s money, the value of the money falls. In Germany in the early 1920s, when prices were on average tripling every month, the quantity of money was also tripling every month. Although less dramatic, the economic history of the United States points to a similar conclusion: The high inflation of the1970s was associated with rapid growth in the quantity of money, and the low inflation of the 1990s was associated with slow growth in the quantity of money.

Principle 10: Society Faces a Short-Run Trade-off between Inflation and Unemployment
Although a higher level of prices is, in the long run, the primary effect of increasing the quantity of money, the short-run story is more complex and more controversial. Most economists describe the short-run effects of monetary injections as follows:
* Increasing the amount of money in the economy stimulates the overall level of spending and thus the demand for goods and services.
* Higher demand may over time cause firms to raise their prices, but in the meantime, it also encourages them to increase the quantity of goods and services they produce and to hire more workers to produce those goods and services.
* More hiring means lower unemployment.
This line of reasoning leads to one final economy wide trade-off: a short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment. Although some economists still question these ideas, most accept that society faces a short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment. This simply means that, over a period of a year or two, many economic policies push inflation and unemployment in opposite directions. This short-run trade-off plays a key role in the analysis of the business cycle-the irregular and largely unpredictable fluctuations in economic activity, as measured by the production of goods and services or the number of people employed.
Click here to download the article

Register to mark your comments

economy case study

Comments

Filed under Articles, Business, Economics, Exclusive Articles